Please watch the Submission status explainer video below for more information. For example, a report showed that 34% of 880 manuscripts submitted to two radiology journals contained information that would either potentially or definitely reveal the identities of the authors or their institution [2]. nature physics. Submission to first editorial decision: the median time (in days) from when a submission is received to when a first editorial decision about whether the paper was sent out for formal review or not is sent to the authors. You will receive more information via email from the production team regarding the publication process. For DBPR papers, we found a statistically significant difference in the OTR rate by gender (2=7.5042, df=1, p value=0.006155); for SBPR papers, we did not find a statistically significant difference in the OTR rate by gender (2=0.72863, df=1, p value=0.3933). We aimed at modelling uptake (baseline SB) based on the following variables (and all their subsets): corresponding authors gender, the group of their institution (1, 2, 3, or 4), the category of their country (Australia, Canada, China, France, Germany, India, Japan, South Korea, the UK, the USA, and Others), and the journal tier (Nature, Nature sister journals, and Nature Communications). 2021: Nature Communications: 14.3 weeks: 42.6 weeks: n/a: 3: 4 (very good . The area under the receiving operating characteristic (ROC) curve is 0.65. 0000003064 00000 n Sodexo Disney Springs, How long time should we wait for editor decision on a manuscript? and Table11 displays the accept rate by review type defined as the number of accepted papers over the total number of accepted or rejected papers. Background Double-blind peer review has been proposed as a possible solution to avoid implicit referee bias in academic publishing. 0000014682 00000 n For this analysis, we included direct submissions as well as transferred manuscripts, because the editorial criteria vary by journal and a manuscript rejected by one journal and transferred to another may then be sent out to review. All communication from submission to publication will be with the corresponding author. In spite of the presence of explicit instructions to authors, this type of review model has sometimes been shown to fail to hide authors identity. Click on the journal name to where you submitted your manuscript. Table3 shows the distribution of DBPR and SBPR in the three gender categories. The Editor has recommended the submission be transferred to another journal, and your response is needed. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 201451 XXXXX@nature.com Final decision for XXXXX. In the ten countries with the highest number of submissions, we found a large significant association between country and review type (p value <0.001, df=10, Cramers V=0.189). Journals can customize the wording of status terms. In our case, the option that the outcome is subject to a complex combination of soft constraints or incentives is possible, which supports our simpler approach of evaluating the variables with the bivariate approach we have reported on. We found that a smaller proportion of DBPR papers are sent to review compared with SBPR papers and that there is a very small but significant association between review type and outcome of the first editorial decision (results of a chi-square test: 2=1623.3, df=1, p value <0.001; Cramers V=0.112). waiting to send decision to author nature. manuscript under consideration 40editor decision started. Moreover, some records were not complete if authors made spelling mistakes when entering the names of their country or institution, as this would have made it impossible to match those names with normalised names for countries or for institutions using GRID. It is calculated by dividing the number of citations in the JCR year by the total number of articles published in the five previous years. How does the Article Transfer Service work for authors? However, we were unable to distinguish the effects of gender bias (from reviewers) and manuscript quality in this observation because an analysis of acceptance rate by gender and review type did not yield statistically significant results. Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts In these scenarios, crowd wisdom peaks early then becomes less accurate as more individuals become involved, explained senior author Iain Couzin, a professor of ecology and evolutionary biology. Nature Communications is an open access, multidisciplinary journal dedicated to publishing high-quality research in all areas of the biological, physical, chemical and Earth sciences. 85,307,200 Downloads (in 2021) One possible explanation for the lack of fit is that more or other predictors would be needed in order to fully explain the response, for example, a measure of quality, as we have already indicated. The science editor has sole responsibility for the decision to accept or reject a manuscript, and that decision is final. In order to assign a measure of institutional prestige to each manuscript, we used the 2016/2017 Times Higher Education rankings (THE [20]) and normalised the institution names using the GRID API. Why did this happen? 2017-07-13 11:21. Usage: If you have previously submitted a paper to a Nature Portfolio journal and would like an update on the status of your submission, please login to the manuscript tracking account for the . How do I find and access my journal's submission system. 0000012316 00000 n We did not find a significant association between gender and review type (Pearsons chi-square test results: 2=0.24883, df=1, p value=0.6179). Thus, we cannot draw conclusions on any editor bias. Please let me know of your decision at your earliest . This is because the Nature journals do not collect information on authors gender, and thus, such information can only be retrieved with name-matching algorithms with limited accuracy. Nature Neuroscience manuscript stage. how to pronounce dandelion witcher. We however included transfers in all other analyses because we considered the analysed items as combinations of three attributes: paper, corresponding author, and journal to which the paper was submitted. When a manuscript is re-ferred, all reviews and recommendations are sent with the manuscript to the receiving journal. n - 2012;114(2):50019. We investigated the question of whether, out of the papers that go to review, manuscripts by female corresponding authors are more likely to be accepted than those with male corresponding authors under DBPR and SBPR. EDR is employed by Macmillan Publishers Ltd, which publishes the Nature-branded journals. botln botkyrka kommun. Data are however available from the authors upon reasonable request and with permission of Springer Nature. You will need to go through the through the decision letter to see what the journal has said about the manuscript. All coauthors must agree to post a preprint and participate inIn Review. by | May 28, 2022 | vga white light on asus motherboard | anskan om utbyte av utlndskt krkort | May 28, 2022 | vga white light on asus motherboard | anskan om utbyte av utlndskt krkort Correct the online article. botln botkyrka kommun. In general, authors from countries with a more recent history of academic excellence are more likely to choose DBPR. To ascertain whether indeed any referee bias is present, we studied the acceptance rate by gender and review type. So, in October 2018, we added a new option for you when you submit to select Springer Nature journals. . https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000001820, Newcombe NS, Bouton ME. This study provides insight on authors behaviour when submitting to high-impact journals. However, we find that a logarithmic-based categorization of this sort would be more representative than a linear-based one. However, when they communicated their decision to the Editor-in-Chief (EiC), who makes the final decision, it was decided to reconsider your manuscript. Times Higher Education - World University Rankings. reparationstapet kllare . Editorial Manager displays status terms as described in the table below. The decision post-review of whether to accept a paper or not is taken by the editor but is based on the feedback received from the referees, so we assume that the decision at this stage would reflect a potential referee bias. 0000004174 00000 n We also analysed the OTR rates by gender of the corresponding author, regardless of review type. To place the results below within the right context, we point out that this study suffered from a key limitation, namely that we did not have an independent measure of quality for the manuscript or a controlled experiment in which the same manuscript is reviewed under both peer review models. Similar to the uptake case, the models do not have a good fit to the data. sciencenature - Yes we could have chosen a different distribution of institutions among the four categories, and will likely have an impact on the uptake of DBPR across the institutional prestige spectrum. Privacy In order to reduce the variability in the institutional affiliations, we normalised the institution names and countries via a Python script that queried the API of the Global Resource Identified Database (GRID [19]). Accelerated Communications, JBC Reviews, Meeting Reports, Letters to the Editor, and Corrections, as well as article types that publish . Res Integr Peer Rev 3, 5 (2018). Regarding gender bias, a study showed that blinding interviewees in orchestra interviews led to more females being hired [8]. Unfortunately, in light of the serious concerns raised by the referees, I regret that our decision must be negative, and we are unable to offer to publish your manuscript in Nature Communications.' Nature. 9 days How many days did the entire process take? As described above, Nature Portfolio has produced the 2-year Median in the table below. Trends Ecol Evol. By using this website, you agree to our 25th Apr, 2017. We aimed at modelling OTR decisions based on the following variables (and all their subsets): review type (SB/DB), corresponding authors gender, the group of their institution (1, 2, 3, or 4), the category of their country (Australia, Canada, China, France, Germany, India, Japan, South Korea, the UK, the USA, and Others), and the journal tier (Nature, Nature sister journals, and Nature Communications).
City Of Torrance Block Wall Detail,
How Do You Make Tiger Meat,
Articles D